ColinEssex

[Kryst51]

I know when it happened. It was rhetorical.

I didn't, so good to know,

 

[KenHigg]

btw - We should ban the links in users signatures. They're tiresome to look at and are too often just a form of self promotion. And there is no need in all the childish 'Welcome to the forum' graphics. Nobody gives 2 cents about them except the person that posts them...

 

[Vassago]

btw - We should ban the links in users signatures. They're tiresome to look at and are too often just a form of self promotion. And there is no need in all the childish 'Welcome to the forum' graphics. Nobody gives 2 cents about them except the person that posts them...

Links in signatures would have to go through Jon. He's allowed standing members to have them. The graphics are a little out there, but at least they don't spread any negativity.

At any rate, this is something probably best posted in the Site Suggestions section above as it's not related to the topic of this thread.

 

[KenHigg]

Links in signatures would have to go through Jon. He's allowed standing members to have them. The graphics are a little out there, but at least they don't spread any negativity.

At any rate, this is something probably best posted in the Site Suggestions section above as it's not related to the topic of this thread.

yes mam...

 

[boblarson]

DELETED BY POSTER (as it was not really beneficial to this thread)

 

[Vassago]

yes mam...

LOL, just pointing out that if they are serious suggestions, Jon may not see it here. He seems to rarely come this far South.

 

[boblarson]

LOL, just pointing out that if they are serious suggestions, Jon may not see it here. He seems to rarely come this far South.

And if they are serious suggestions, then I think a few more "rules" would be in order if we are going to get that nitpicky.

 

[Kryst51]

DELETED BY POSTER (as it was not really beneficial to this thread)

Oh, how curious I am..... Did you try to put a graphic in?

 

[boblarson]

Oh, how curious I am..... Did you try to put a graphic in?

Nope, it wasn't a graphic, but it may have been GRAPHIC

Here's a graphic for Ken. It shows where he can avoid those nasty signatures and images:

 

[Kryst51]

Nope, it wasn't a graphic, but it may have been GRAPHIC

Here's a graphic for Ken. It shows where he can avoid those nasty signatures and images: I, Krystal, deleted the graphic for space saving

Ha Ha! I see. Actually that is a very good reminder, thanks!

Edit: I corrected my grammar....

 

[Rich]

Well here's a suggestion for Bobby, why not just delete your profile, user name etc and then come back with a new user name, nobody will know who you are until you start arguing and insulting them on the main boards. Simple eh?

 

[ajetrumpet]

Given that he's got an obsession with me

maybe he likes you bob. btw, welcome back to posting. laughing...

on a side note, I'm happy others finally get a break from him. but then again, anyone can choose what they look at and what they don't

 

[Rich]

As pointed out, no posts were deleted. Removing their user ids was definitely a poor decision that I'm sure Bob regrets. It seems to me that everyone involved in that fued has moved on except one. Hopefully he can see it's futile to harrass someone who has no interest in responding and he can get over it. How long ago did this happen? Seriously!

Yeah, Bush carries on too as if NOTHING happened in exactly the same way
Nice judgement by those elected to high office here by the Republican former ruler

 

[Vassago]

Yeah, Bush carries on too as if NOTHING happened in exactly the same way
Nice judgement by those elected to high office here by the Republican former ruler

It's not carrying on as if nothing happened, it's called letting go. It's old news that took place two years ago. People move on as you had seemed to until you posted that. No major harm has been done.

Bush is an idiot. You won't get an argument out of me on that. But what does he have to do with this thread?

 

[Rich]

But what does he have to do with this thread?

Both acted in the same manner. If someone has to move on, why the hell should it be me, get my drift?

 

[KenHigg]

Nope, it wasn't a graphic, but it may have been GRAPHIC

Here's a graphic for Ken. It shows where he can avoid those nasty signatures and images:

Now I remember why I hate coming around here.

Rich, email me when he has another going away party...

 

[boblarson]

edit - Changed my mind - shouldn't stoop to their level.

 

[boblarson]

Changed my mind - shouldn't stoop to their level.

 

[Vassago]

Both acted in the same manner. If someone has to move on, why the hell should it be me, get my drift?

I just thought you were over the situation that happened. I didn't realize it still affected you today after two years... I'm not saying move on as in leave, I'm saying you had put it aside and didn't care about it anymore.

I think Bob has moved on too. He seems to be more focused on moderating and helping others. The member in question went after him on the help forum, damaging what I believe to be the reputation and respect of this site. I don't think that would be good for AWF or Jon.

 

[Vassago]

Now I remember why I hate coming around here.

Rich, email me when he has another going away party...

Was that really necessary? As Mods, we don't make the rules, we just enforce them. The rules allow established members to have links. Only Jon can change that.

As for the graphic, what is the big deal over a little image anyway? Why does it bother you so much? Others don't seem to mind.

I guess I'm just trying to understand.