Who was the chief in CHARGE?
Okay .. so Powell had bad judgement when he made Bush's case for war.
Does that mean he is excercising the same bad judgement on his choice for nomination?
-dk
Who was the chief in CHARGE?
Colin was under orders previously, now he can excercise the freedom of speech that the US claims to haveOkay .. so Powell had bad judgement when he made Bush's case for war.
Does that mean he is excercising the same bad judgement on his choice for nomination?
-dk
Most American politicians don't have such high standardslol ... okay, so there was no way he could have resigned even though that is what he did later?
-dk
Most American politicians don't have such high standards
The fact that he resigned shows good judgement, not bad, it just took him a little time.Now if only Bush was half the man ehSo his standard wasn't high enough to resign when he was ordered to make a case for war, but yet later because he was upset with Rumsfeld and the bunch. That shows bad judgement there.
-dk
The fact that he resigned shows good judgement, not bad, it just took him a little time.Now if only Bush was half the man eh
Nope, he woke up eventually and did the right thinglol ... so if he took a little more time, he might regret this decision and change it.
-dK
Yes he's still a Republicanlol
Ya think there is no ounce to anything that he isn't doing for popularity reasons?
-dk
I beg to differ. Bush IS an attack on us. He's caused thousands of deaths in a needless war AND allowed the person who did attack us to survive for seven years because of his own personal agenda, not to mentioned destroyed not just the national economy, but global economies. That's quite an attack and it's gone on for far too long.
I should just like to point out that had Bush not had his head stuck somewhere it shouldn't have been and heeded the warnings 9/11 wouldn't have happened..........
The brave soldiers who fought for Iraq's independence were not killed by Bush
Who asked the America to give Iraq freedom and from who?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2003/sep/06/september11.iraqWhat are "the" warnings? Specifically who warned? What were the specific warnings? Why didn't this come out in the 9/11 report? How come you're the only one who seems to know this?
I'm not blinded by patriotismHow come you're the only one who seems to know this?
The UN wouldn't support the invasion of Iraq that's why the falsified WMD document was issuedA happy side effect of the coalition enforcing UN resolutions from the early 1990s.
As far as the "from who" part, my guess is the brutal regime of Hussein (not Hussein Obama, the other one).
I'm not blinded by patriotism
I don't hate anybody thanks! I just seek out the truth, had you read the entire article you could have learnt somethingThat is true. I think it must be something else blinding you, perhaps unbridled hate of Bush (or Blair).
The UN wouldn't support the invasion of Iraq that's why the falsified WMD document was issued