Rich, I've given up trying to enlighten you. Why? Because your mind is closed and forever poisoned against all things USA.
By giving up, it is not that you have won this game of verbal sparring; it is rather that you have shown your disdain for the slightest possibility that your answers might not be 100% right. Which means you have proven that you have already lost but don't admit it to yourself. After a while, even the most persistent of us realizes we are beating a dead horse. (I'll leave it to you to decide which PART of the dead horse is being beaten.)
I acknowledge that there are no simple answers to the "what if" game: What if the USA had entered WW2 earlier or later? What if we had not supplied some of the "freedom fighters" who later became our enemies? What if we let the situation in Iraq go on longer? What if we had taken down Saddam during GHWB's term rather than stopping after 100 hours? We can play the "what if" game forever, but the only REAL game is "what IS."
I regret that you cannot see parallels between WW2 and current-day Israel. Today's wars aren't always fought by the countries actually waging the war. Sometimes they fight through proxies. For instance, the Korean war and Viet Nam wars were actually mainland China against whomever, but they chose a "neutral" country as their battlefields. (Doubt me? Check supply routes for both situations.) And Israel is the proxy for the war that Iran really wants to fight against all of the west. (Doubt me? Track the origin of the money that bought the missiles.)
The parallels are there. Details? Yes, very different. Situation? Not really so different. As to whether we are supplying the bombs that kill innocent civilians... (1) So why don't you chastise the countries that supplied Israel's enemies - or don't you think of THEM as innocent, too? (2) To some ways of thinking, there ARE no innocent civilians in Lebanon if they allowed Hezbollah to operate with impunity. Tacit acceptance is acceptance. Failure to oppose is acceptance.
Rich, you also have this thing about racism in the USA. It isn't a monolithic "all or nothing at all" situation. It is a matter of degree. Racism exists EVERYWHERE including your beloved UK. But the devil is in the details. We are eliminating one type/target of racism only to find that it has been replaced by another target. And I dare say if you were truly objective, you would find the same to be true for the UK.
Therefore, Rich, have fun with your tactic of repeated intransigence to new ideas. Oh, by the way - if you are ever accosted by gang-bangers, refuse to acknowledge their ideas and requests, too. When you recover from your hospital stay, if you still have fingers left, let us know how it came out. Here, you can use that tactic. In the real world, you would find yourself an outcast very quickly.