Locking Record File Types (1 Viewer)

Rolly189

Registered User.
Local time
Tomorrow, 08:42
Joined
Jul 28, 2012
Messages
18
Hi

I have inherited a number of 2007 Access databases that have a PDF (Adobe Acrobat Document) as the file type for the locking record.

These databases seem significantly slower, and have more frequent "Not Responding" periods on the network - especially when compared to those with a standard ldb file type locking record.

Is this the reality ?

What determines the file type for a locking record?

Can the Adobe locking record be changed to a ldb? and How?

Thanks
Rolly
 
Last edited:

GinaWhipp

AWF VIP
Local time
Today, 16:42
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
5,899
Huh? Did someone change the *Open With*? Never seen a .PDF file used as a Locking file.
 

gemma-the-husky

Super Moderator
Staff member
Local time
Today, 21:42
Joined
Sep 12, 2006
Messages
15,755
I agree. I think you are missing something

a .mdb will use a temporary .ldb file
a .accdb will use a .laccdb file
 

vbaInet

AWF VIP
Local time
Today, 21:42
Joined
Jan 22, 2010
Messages
26,374
My only guess is that Microsoft realised that their naming convention for the older format (ldb) was a bit off, so they decided to set things straight. They probably thought that the only format they'll have was an mdb so ldb meant "lock database". They should have initially called it lmdb "lock Microsoft database".
So I guess laccdb makes more sense, "lock Access 2007/2010 database".

Just my thoughts Gina. :)
 

Uncle Gizmo

Nifty Access Guy
Staff member
Local time
Today, 21:42
Joined
Jul 9, 2003
Messages
16,426
>>>They should have initially called it lmdb "lock Microsoft database<<<

Years back before you were born, you could only have a three character file extension.
 

GinaWhipp

AWF VIP
Local time
Today, 16:42
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
5,899
@vbaInet... I'll go with that!

@Uncle Gizmo... That I do remember!
 

Rolly189

Registered User.
Local time
Tomorrow, 08:42
Joined
Jul 28, 2012
Messages
18
Locking record is definitely a pdf - and it was someone had chage the "open with"

Thanks
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom