I don't know what the punishment is for leaking but whatever it is, it should be applied to Alito if in fact it is proven that he was the leaker. You cannot "convict" him on hearsay evidence. It has to be evidence given under oath by the receiving parties or email evidence or something else that is indisputable.
Just the former would not be good enough, that's he-said vs. he-said. (Recall that's how feminists want ra** cases decided - on the pure say-so of the woman, with zero actual evidence of lack of consent of any kind).
Schenchk has been on the warpath to destroy Christianity's reputation for years now. I don't trust anything he says.
I listened to him as a child he visited my church in Marshfield, WI when I was but a lad. Passionate Christian missionary at the time.
I rarely hear of people de-converting from such a position, but he definitely has. Spends all his time now trying to train-wreck any Christian's reputation he can find.
It makes zero sense he would have this information for 7 years and just 'suddenly' decide to publish it.
A sincere person would have published it the day after, or shortly.
