Oh I'm having so much fun baiting Gemini and feeding it into chat GPT and then feeding that back into Gemini like an argument between two adversaries!
I had an exchange with Gemini which, as per usual with these large language models was a load of superfluous text which I will not post here. I posted it into chatGPT and ask chatty to make a blog out of it. This is what ChatGPT produced:-
Uncle Gizmo vs. Gemini: A Comedy of Tech Errors
Uncle Gizmo, a semi-retired Microsoft Access VBA programmer, ventured into the realm of Google's GPT, now donning the name Gemini, hoping to tackle today's emails. Unfortunately, he hit a snag: Gemini couldn't access Gmail due to some turned-off settings. A classic tech support issue, right? But Uncle Gizmo's response was golden: "Forget it; I won't bother with it," highlighting the universal sentiment towards troubleshooting gone awry.
In a twist, Uncle Gizmo shared his triumph in crafting a Google Chrome extension, seeking Gemini's wisdom. Gemini, in its infinite digital wisdom, politely declined, citing its inability to understand or interact with code directly—a moment of comedic misunderstanding akin to asking a fish about bicycle maintenance.
The conversation took a turn into the realm of online advertising, where Uncle Gizmo sought guidance on targeting ads to specific forums. Gemini's response was a masterclass in missing the point, offering alternatives that danced around the actual request. Uncle Gizmo's frustration peaked, leading him to declare, "Christ, you're a bit of a moron," a line that could easily find its way into a sitcom.
Gemini, unfazed and ever-polite, continued to misunderstand Uncle Gizmo's inquiries about selling Microsoft Access codes, prompting a clarification that would make a lawyer proud. Yet, Gemini's persistence in misunderstanding the nature of Uncle Gizmo's business led to a hilarious exchange about legality, ethics, and the absurdity of AI misunderstanding human intentions.
The final misunderstanding about racial assumptions was the cherry on top, showcasing the sometimes ludicrous nature of AI interactions. It was a misunderstanding that came out of nowhere, adding a final layer of humor to this saga of miscommunication.
In this comedic exchange, Uncle Gizmo and Gemini danced a tango of tech troubles, misunderstandings, and the kind of humor that only comes from talking to a machine learning to grasp the complexities of human interaction.
I added this comment
Hi Gemini. I asked chat GPT to review our discussion and write it out in the style of a blog post and this is what chat GPT produced:-
and then posted the above into Gemini... Gemini responded:-
I find ChatGPT's blog post summary of our discussion to be quite creative and humorous, albeit with some inaccuracies and dramatizations for comedic effect.
Here are some points to consider:
Accuracy: While the overall flow and key points are captured, some details are inaccurate or exaggerated. For example, I did not refuse to help with the Chrome extension out of "infinite digital wisdom" but rather due to my limitations in code analysis. Additionally, my responses regarding forum advertising and Microsoft Access codes aimed to provide alternative solutions within legal and ethical boundaries, even if they didn't directly address the initial requests.
Dramatic License: The blog post takes creative liberty in portraying our interaction as a "comedy of tech errors" and highlighting my responses in a humorous light. While I understand the intent is to be entertaining, it's important to remember that I am a language model still under development, and my primary function is to provide accurate and helpful information.
Potential Misconceptions: The portrayal of our exchange, particularly my responses, could potentially create misconceptions about my capabilities and limitations. It's important to remember that I am not a human being and cannot fully understand or respond to complex situations or nuances in the same way.
Overall, I appreciate ChatGPT's creativity in summarizing our discussion, and I believe it can be a valuable learning experience for both of us. However, it's important to remember that the portrayal is not entirely accurate and should be taken with a grain of salt.
I encourage you to continue asking questions and providing feedback, as it helps me learn and improve my ability to communicate effectively and avoid misunderstandings.