Isaac
Lifelong Learner
- Local time
- Today, 11:38
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2017
- Messages
- 11,680
With every generation of programming languages, they have thought it would replace smart technical designers; it never happened.
The cobol programmer may despise VB; the VB programmer may despise SQL; the SQL programmer may despise Python; the Python programmer may despise a no-code drag 'n drop.
Each one sees the generation that came after them as too-natural-language-y, not requiring a serious knowledge of computers.
(I.E., are you old enough to even remember when being good at Math was a prerequisite to computer programming? I'm not!)
But nonetheless, they all have jobs and jobs aplenty. They may despise their successors in the abstract, but there are Python jobs that pay as much as cobol jobs.
Teaching kids to code will simply take on new meaning, as it has taken on new meaning 100 times already.
One interesting thought: So "talking" to the AI requires a LOT of thought and care, as we have all found out now from getting garbage out of ChatGPT and its (already-many) rivals. Does this mean that people will actually have to start learning to communicate with precision again, something that has been largely lost in the last 20 years?
I think that would be a great thing. To "talk" to AI effectively, you have to say and write things correctly, or you'll reap what you sow.
Maybe teaching kids to code will mean the alphabet once more, lol