Ukraine

That's why the UN is impotent. This is why GWB went after Iraq. The UN wouldn't do it.
It was at that momment, while I was still on Active Duty, that I realised that it was all a big joke and that there had to be a different reason other than WMD. We have been had...
 
Last edited:
1647011912626.png
 
in the future reference will be made that the first female VP was clueless.
This is what happens when you choose people who check boxes instead of ones who could actually do the job. I'm sure there are literally thousands of black women (even some who are Democrats) who could actually have been excellent Vice Presidents but the best of them would have been insulted for being chosen because they were black and female. Candice Owens comes to mind but she's the wrong party. She is brilliant, extremely well spoken, and politically astute.
This is why GWB went after Iraq.
He went after Iraq because he wanted to finish Daddy's war the way it should have been finished. That's why our "intelligence" agencies found all those non-existent weapons of mass destruction.
If she is, then the same thing applies to her boss.
Biden isn't the brightest bulb in the room but he' not an idiot. His problem is medical. Pushing him into this position was elder abuse and a crime against the American people, many of them who were so afraid of that evil orange man that they would have voted for a toad. And that's what they got. Sadly, it affects all of us.
 
instead of ones who could actually do the job.

Trump Could...

Like I said somewhere else, Donald might be a bad boy, but he's YOUR BAD BOY. You need a bad boy to take on a bad boy. Like Winston Churchill, he was conniving, scheming and up to all sorts of dodgy things behind the scenes, but he got the job done. That's the point...
 
Like Winston Churchill, he was conniving, scheming and up to all sorts of dodgy things behind the scenes
But unlike Biden, he was working for Britain and not for himself. Same with Trump. He was working for US and not himself.
 
I understand that a few UK soldiers have gone AWOL to fight in the Ukraine....
 
Reagan was a wise man. If only we were in a position to take the high ground:( We made and broke too many promises to Russia but at least the promises were not actual treaties. Now we just look like impotent idiots. Putin is a bad man but we are not blameless in this crisis.
 
I agree. So have I. When I hitched around Europe when I was 18, it took me 2 hours to get a lift into Switzerland. Two young ladies rocked up, stuck their thumbs out and got a lift in about 30 seconds! Also, having to pay for entrance on "Ladies Night" in nightclubs, which was often a Friday. Women get in free. Is that discriminating based on gender? :sick:

There does tend to be a double standard on gender issues. Feminists want equality and non-discrimination based on gender. Tell that to the Ukrainian men who are not allowed to leave the country, only women and children. The men get conscripted and sent to their deaths in a bloody war. You can't have it both ways. Either you believe in non-discrimination or you don't. You can't pick and choose based how unpleasant the task is.

Jon, that is such a good point.

While there has been plenty of discrimination against women, as a male, it's quite obvious to me that BOTH genders have unique advantages, and BOTH genders have unique areas where they either are at a disadvantage or bear an extra burden - or whatever.

It is reasonable for the average person to keep both in mind - equally.

Interestingly, women have unloaded many of theirs. For example, most women would expect their husband NOT to expect them to be at home with an apron, iron and mop.

But if you hear the sound of glass breaking in your window in the middle of the night, or the doorbell rings at 2 AM, or whatever...........
Guess which gender will be expected to get up and confront....../ absorb......./make contact with, whatever / whoever it is? The man of course. And the same goes for all physical hurt, all pain and suffering, all danger and risk and confrontation and danger: The man is put out in front. With one exception of course, the non-trivial one of childbirth. (But that's optional).

One thing I will go as far as to say I am sick of articles that say things like: 100 people were hurt yesterday, including many women and children.
As if the women's lives and pain are worth so much more than a man's.

Last time I checked, a bullet entering one's body hurts a man as much as it hurts a woman. Although men may be treated as disposables bodies to throw at a conflict, their pain is just as painful.

I'm fine with being the gender that steps up and absorbs the brunt of physical pain and suffering, because God created men with a bit of a tendency to want to step up and deal with that stuff, as is fairly obvious to everyone. That doesn't mean I appreciate it being overlooked, nor society to pretend men's pain isn't just as painful as it would be for a woman.

There should be the exact same amount of sympathy for every last random 18 yr old man forced to fight and get hurt in Ukraine the same as a story covering women getting hurt.

Discrimination against women has definitely happened and been bad, but they are not without their distinct advantages..
 
Oliver Stone made a documentary back in 2016 "Ukraine on fire". The Documentary covers the 2014 Maidan Massacre and the overthrow of Ukrainian leader Viktor Yanukovych, among other topics including Flight 17 (MH17/MAS17). In light of current events in Ukraine and Russia, some platforms have decided not to carry Stone's Documentary presumably because it doesn't fit the current narrative.
 
One thing I will go as far as to say I am sick of articles that say things like: 100 people were hurt yesterday, including many women and children.
As if the women's lives and pain are worth so much more than a man's.
@Isaac I agree with all points in your previous email, and I too have thought similar things about the phrase, "including many women and children". Imagine the outcry if in Chicago they said, "100 people were hurt in Chicago yesterday, including many Whites!" (I so desperately wanted to put Trump supporters in there, but I resisted! :ROFLMAO: )

When you sign up for equality, you also sign up for no special privileges. It's in the contract!

Having said all that, we are emotional animals with millions of years of behavioural programming. Whatever the social narrative of today is, it does not overcome the biological imprints in our DNA. You can deny nature, and say it's all nurture. But ultimately, you will just be blinding yourself to the reality of humankind.
 
I'm pretty sure the cast system has been banned in India but is still alive and well. People have internal biases that they may not even recognize. Women and children are "always" non-combatants is one assumption. But the assumption is being made by people far separated from the action. When a war comes to you, it becomes up close and personal, everyone is a combatant if they want to survive.
 
One thing I will go as far as to say I am sick of articles that say things like: 100 people were hurt yesterday, including many women and children.
As if the women's lives and pain are worth so much more than a man's.
Since this topic came-up. Women's lives for obvious biological reasons were more important then men's lives. This is a situation where people still carry-on with old beliefs even-though the basis for those beliefs has ended. Having large families in the old days was a must. Now it is actually detrimental to have large families. Those beliefs ended as maternal mortality and child mortality declined. Society has been slow to recognize that.
 
Now it is actually detrimental to have large families
Unless you want to expand your philosophical and moral camp, in which case I think conservatives and Christians having large families is probably one of the best things we can possibly do for the world.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom