AccessBlaster
Registered User.
- Local time
- Today, 05:28
- Joined
- May 22, 2010
- Messages
- 7,484
Back when Kamala Harris was arm candy for Montel Williams Nato and the Clinton's were pushing eastward expansion. So why are people surprised?
If only she were not a complete moron. When you ask her a question she has no answer for she cracks up hysterically. It is funny to watch and the interviewer usually joins in, but really sad. She is a heartbeat away from the presidency and she is completely clueless.She could still get the job done
Since the Clinton's came-up. The demise of Muammar Gaddafi was an apparent Hillary Clinton "hit job". Bill Clinton, took the side of Muslims in Bosnia by launching cruise missiles into Serbian held areas of Bosnia. (Perhaps the first example of Democrats using the official power of the US to openly supporting Muslims.)the Clinton's were pushing eastward expansion. So why are people surprised?
On 19 March 2011, a multi-state NATO-led coalition began a military intervention in Libya, to implement United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973, in response to events during the First Libyan Civil War. With ten votes in favour and five abstentions, the UN Security Council's intent was to have "an immediate ceasefire in Libya, including an end to the current attacks against civilians, which it said might constitute “crimes against humanity” ... [imposing] a ban on all flights in the country's airspace — a no-fly zone — and tightened sanctions on the [Muammar] Qadhafi regime and its supporters."
Am I the only one who sees a problem here? We also sit on the security council. Can we invade Canada with impunity?The problem of course is that Russia and China have veto power in the UN.
Unfortunately any member of the permanent security council can get away with anything. The rule that all five members must agree is beyond stupid. There are ten members of the non permanent security council. How about if ten members agree, a resolution passes?Am I the only one who sees a problem here? We also sit on the security council. Can we invade Canada with impunity?
She's an embarrassment. So to answer your question, no.Is the presence of a VP not a strong representation of a Government?
The whole idea of the UN does not favor most countries, if most countries of the world were better governed and advanced, UN ideology won't sell far.I don't believe that the Ukrainians should be abandoned to deal alone with the Russians. Where the hell is the UN? Isn't the UN supposed to stop this type of aggression? Why is the UN allowing Russia to get away with invading another sovereign country?
If she is, then the same thing applies to her boss.She's an embarrassment. So to answer your question, no.
How can the UN be united, when its security council is polarised. Russia and China VS the rest.The rule that all five members must agree is beyond stupid
Hmm, that is soo sad, because in the future reference will be made that the first female VP was clueless.f only she were not a complete moron. When you ask her a question she has no answer for she cracks up hysterically. It is funny to watch and the interviewer usually joins in, but really sad. She is a heartbeat away from the presidency and she is completely clueless.
This might be what triggered the War because Putin knows that the USA will not allow such if they were in the shoes of Russia.Unfortunately, Biden/Harris made provocative statements to the effect that if the Ukraine wanted to be in NATO that that was Ukraine's right and Russia had no right to interfere
Absolutely!If she is, then the same thing applies to her boss.
She's an embarrassment to the Women's Movement.Hmm, that is soo sad, because in the future reference will be made that the first female VP was clueless.
That's why the UN is impotent. This is why GWB went after Iraq. The UN wouldn't do it.How can the UN be united, when its security council is polarised. Russia and China VS the rest.