Ukraine

That's why the UN is impotent. This is why GWB went after Iraq. The UN wouldn't do it.
It was at that momment, while I was still on Active Duty, that I realised that it was all a big joke and that there had to be a different reason other than WMD. We have been had...
 
Last edited:
1647011912626.png
 
instead of ones who could actually do the job.

Trump Could...

Like I said somewhere else, Donald might be a bad boy, but he's YOUR BAD BOY. You need a bad boy to take on a bad boy. Like Winston Churchill, he was conniving, scheming and up to all sorts of dodgy things behind the scenes, but he got the job done. That's the point...
 
I understand that a few UK soldiers have gone AWOL to fight in the Ukraine....
 
I agree. So have I. When I hitched around Europe when I was 18, it took me 2 hours to get a lift into Switzerland. Two young ladies rocked up, stuck their thumbs out and got a lift in about 30 seconds! Also, having to pay for entrance on "Ladies Night" in nightclubs, which was often a Friday. Women get in free. Is that discriminating based on gender? :sick:

There does tend to be a double standard on gender issues. Feminists want equality and non-discrimination based on gender. Tell that to the Ukrainian men who are not allowed to leave the country, only women and children. The men get conscripted and sent to their deaths in a bloody war. You can't have it both ways. Either you believe in non-discrimination or you don't. You can't pick and choose based how unpleasant the task is.

Jon, that is such a good point.

While there has been plenty of discrimination against women, as a male, it's quite obvious to me that BOTH genders have unique advantages, and BOTH genders have unique areas where they either are at a disadvantage or bear an extra burden - or whatever.

It is reasonable for the average person to keep both in mind - equally.

Interestingly, women have unloaded many of theirs. For example, most women would expect their husband NOT to expect them to be at home with an apron, iron and mop.

But if you hear the sound of glass breaking in your window in the middle of the night, or the doorbell rings at 2 AM, or whatever...........
Guess which gender will be expected to get up and confront....../ absorb......./make contact with, whatever / whoever it is? The man of course. And the same goes for all physical hurt, all pain and suffering, all danger and risk and confrontation and danger: The man is put out in front. With one exception of course, the non-trivial one of childbirth. (But that's optional).

One thing I will go as far as to say I am sick of articles that say things like: 100 people were hurt yesterday, including many women and children.
As if the women's lives and pain are worth so much more than a man's.

Last time I checked, a bullet entering one's body hurts a man as much as it hurts a woman. Although men may be treated as disposables bodies to throw at a conflict, their pain is just as painful.

I'm fine with being the gender that steps up and absorbs the brunt of physical pain and suffering, because God created men with a bit of a tendency to want to step up and deal with that stuff, as is fairly obvious to everyone. That doesn't mean I appreciate it being overlooked, nor society to pretend men's pain isn't just as painful as it would be for a woman.

There should be the exact same amount of sympathy for every last random 18 yr old man forced to fight and get hurt in Ukraine the same as a story covering women getting hurt.

Discrimination against women has definitely happened and been bad, but they are not without their distinct advantages..
 
Oliver Stone made a documentary back in 2016 "Ukraine on fire". The Documentary covers the 2014 Maidan Massacre and the overthrow of Ukrainian leader Viktor Yanukovych, among other topics including Flight 17 (MH17/MAS17). In light of current events in Ukraine and Russia, some platforms have decided not to carry Stone's Documentary presumably because it doesn't fit the current narrative.
 
One thing I will go as far as to say I am sick of articles that say things like: 100 people were hurt yesterday, including many women and children.
As if the women's lives and pain are worth so much more than a man's.
@Isaac I agree with all points in your previous email, and I too have thought similar things about the phrase, "including many women and children". Imagine the outcry if in Chicago they said, "100 people were hurt in Chicago yesterday, including many Whites!" (I so desperately wanted to put Trump supporters in there, but I resisted! :ROFLMAO: )

When you sign up for equality, you also sign up for no special privileges. It's in the contract!

Having said all that, we are emotional animals with millions of years of behavioural programming. Whatever the social narrative of today is, it does not overcome the biological imprints in our DNA. You can deny nature, and say it's all nurture. But ultimately, you will just be blinding yourself to the reality of humankind.
 
One thing I will go as far as to say I am sick of articles that say things like: 100 people were hurt yesterday, including many women and children.
As if the women's lives and pain are worth so much more than a man's.
Since this topic came-up. Women's lives for obvious biological reasons were more important then men's lives. This is a situation where people still carry-on with old beliefs even-though the basis for those beliefs has ended. Having large families in the old days was a must. Now it is actually detrimental to have large families. Those beliefs ended as maternal mortality and child mortality declined. Society has been slow to recognize that.
 
Now it is actually detrimental to have large families
Unless you want to expand your philosophical and moral camp, in which case I think conservatives and Christians having large families is probably one of the best things we can possibly do for the world.
 
an emerging conspiracy angle that we can luxuriate over. Is Biden covertly tossing the Ukraine under the bus so that he can get the Iran deal signed?

There appears to be a formidable amount of circumstantial evidence that would support this viewpoint.
  • For some adamant unknown fanatical reason the Obama administration was hell bent on getting a nuclear (personal) deal with Iran. Trump of course tore-up that disastrous personal commitment by Obama. Since assuming office, Biden has been negating Trump's actions. Biden, reinvigorated making a "new" nuclear deal with Iran. As with Obama, the background narrative seems to imply that the Biden administration is insanely focused on getting such a (personal) deal accomplished no matter what the cost. (The Iranian deal is a personal deal as US Senate approval is apparently not being considered. So it would not be a "treaty".)
  • The Russians, are representing the US at the negotiating table. Considering that Russia just invaded the Ukraine and that the US, on the surface is opposed to that Russian action, how can Russia rationally represent US interests? Seems to be a conflict of interest.
  • Biden is proposing to obtain oil from Iran rather than increase domestic oil production in the US. Seems that is can be interpreted as grovelling before Iran.
  • The import of military assistance into the Ukraine seems to be hitting various "obstructions" and "bureaucratic" concerns. The most recent boondoggle, the reluctance to delivering Mig-29s to the Ukraine. Biden claims to stand with the Ukraine, but seems to be "slow-walking" the assistance as if he is reluctant to actually provide it.
  • Biden created a brief flurry of news when he flipped-flopped then flopped-flipped on calling Putin a war criminal. So what is the real message being sent to Putin? If Biden is actually calling Putin a "war criminal", Putin may well direct the Russians supposedly negotiating on our behalf with Iran to sabotage those negotiations. So is Biden avoiding calling Putin out to keep the Iran negotiations alive?
Based on all the factors above it would appear that Biden is throwing the Ukraine under the proverbial bus to achieve some-sort of agreement with Iran.
 
Biden is now on his way to Europe. Some of the pundits at Fox News speculated that Biden has been purposely "slow walking" Ukrainian aid so that he personally could make a major announcement while in Europe to demonstrate substantive US support for Ukraine. I suspect that we will soon see a video documentary of Biden personally flying a Mig-29 into the Ukraine!!o_O
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom