Baby Euthanasia (1 Viewer)

ColinEssex said:
Odd isn't it? comparatively, the church, christ and god are all dead ducks, yet some pervert archbishop in a skirt can dictate when we go shopping?

Col
and the Church can still change intended government policy! But then hell, so can a bloody tv chef with the current mob:rolleyes:
 
ColinEssex said:
Odd isn't it? comparatively, the church, christ and god are all dead ducks, yet some pervert archbishop in a skirt can dictate when we go shopping?

Col

Aren’t you two Bozos always touting British freedom over American freedom?

Over here our shopping is not dictated by our government. And certainly our Church leaders don’t show up in Congress asking for a NATIONAL ban on Easter Shopping.
 
Brianwarnock said:
If the church had as much power as you say then there would be no Sunday trading, why should shop workers have to work on sundays and bank holidays when the majority of workers don't? OK that'll hi jack the thread sorry.

Brian
They don't have to Brian, do they?
 
jsanders said:
Aren’t you two Bozos always touting British freedom over American freedom?

Over here our shopping is not dictated by our government. And certainly our Church leaders don’t show up in Congress asking for a NATIONAL ban on Easter Shopping.
Nah, just abortion, gay marriage etc etc :rolleyes:
 
Rich said:
They don't have to Brian, do they?

Yes, atleast my son in law who is an assistant store manager has no option, perhaps shelve stackers do, but I doubt it. He hasn't had a Sunday off for 4 weeks, hardly conducive to family life as thats the day the rest are at home.

Brian
 
Brianwarnock said:
Yes, atleast my son in law who is an assistant store manager has no option, perhaps shelve stackers do, but I doubt it. He hasn't had a Sunday off for 4 weeks, hardly conducive to family life as thats the day the rest are at home.

Brian
One could argue the same for Saturdays Bri, with a day off in the week in rota;)
 
To getting the thread back on topic...

I thought the title of this thread was a bit odd and I really don't know why; Instead of 'Baby Euthanasia', wouldn't something like 'Infant Euthanasia' have been more fitting?
 
Rich said:
at the minute

It will take an amendment to the constitution to ratify that. Where do you suppose the support is going to come from?
 
Rich said:
One could argue the same for Saturdays Bri, with a day off in the week in rota;)

The problem is he works Saturday and Sunday with 2 days off in the week, not nescessarily consecutive days, so the twain never meet.

Still absence makes the heart grow fonder and all that tosh:rolleyes:

Brian
 
Brianwarnock said:
Yes, atleast my son in law who is an assistant store manager has no option, perhaps shelve stackers do, but I doubt it. He hasn't had a Sunday off for 4 weeks, hardly conducive to family life as thats the day the rest are at home.

Brian
well Bri - if he doesn't like it - change jobs - simple.:rolleyes:

He gets a day off in the week I expect, and enhanced pay for the sunday?

Col
 
KenHigg said:
To getting the thread back on topic...

I thought the title of this thread was a bit odd and I really don't know why; Instead of 'Baby Euthanasia', wouldn't something like 'Infant Euthanasia' have been more fitting?

I thought that we were discussing, now and again :D , the killing of new borns, they are considered babies over here, can you expand your point.

Brian
 
some of the little brats should have been drowned at birth:cool:

Col
 
jsanders said:
It will take an amendment to the constitution to ratify that. Where do you suppose the support is going to come from?
The church
 
KenHigg said:
To getting the thread back on topic...

I thought the title of this thread was a bit odd and I really don't know why; Instead of 'Baby Euthanasia', wouldn't something like 'Infant Euthanasia' have been more fitting?
Didn't god order the massacre of his own children?:confused:
 
ColinEssex said:
some of the little brats should have been drowned at birth:cool:

Col

Yes along with their parents but I think that's a different case :cool:

Brian
 
ColinEssex said:
some of the little brats should have been drowned at birth:cool:

Col
we certainly ought to bring back the ducking stool for some of 'em!
 
Brianwarnock said:
I thought that we were discussing, now and again :D , the killing of new borns, they are considered babies over here, can you expand your point.

Brian

Hum... Not sure how to. Over here, in a more formal discussion, seems 'infant' would be more fitting. Not much more to it than that I guess. :) :)
 
Rich said:
Didn't god order the massacre of his own children?:confused:
similarly, god manipulated the Romans into killing his "own" son, but then again if god knew he [jesus] was going to be ok in the long run, it seems less of a sacrifice - all this "god sacrificed his only son" rubbish is just overdramatisation, you can't sacrifice something then get it back later on.

Its like saying I'm happy for the vet to put my dog down - knowing that the dog will be ok again in a month or so. There's no sadness, in fact, a nice little break for a holiday without kennel fees.

Col
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom