The Covid cure has arrived! (3 Viewers)


In 2015 the developers of ivermectin received a Nobel prize for its use as an antimalarial treatment, yet many media outlets contemptuously condemn ivermectin, only mentioning it in a negative construct as an animal de-wormer medication as if had no other use. What happened to follow the science?

The media outlets don't seem to care about the science. They are wildly spewing disgusting political disinformation. As Gutfeld notes, those condemning ivermectin are not journalists. The Rolling Stones article, above, being an example.

Note: the efficacy of any drug takes time to develop. How well ivermectin works as a Covid therapeutic has not been well established, but work is being done. Yet, for some reason, much of the media has no apparent interest in examining the efficacy of ivermectin, only in loudly condemning it and vilifying anyone who attempts to document the efficacy of ivermectin.
 
Incorrect, or as you like to put it, Fake News!

The Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet has today decided to award

the 2015 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine

with one half jointly to

William C. Campbell and Satoshi Ōmura
for their discoveries concerning a novel therapy against infections caused by roundworm parasites

and the other half to

Tu Youyou
for her discoveries concerning a novel therapy against Malaria​

William C. Campbell and Satoshi Ōmura discovered a new drug, Avermectin, the derivatives of which have radically lowered the incidence of River Blindness and Lymphatic Filariasis, as well as showing efficacy against an expanding number of other parasitic diseases. Tu Youyou discovered Artemisinin, a drug that has significantly reduced the mortality rates for patients suffering from Malaria.
 
In 2015, the Nobel Committee for Physiology or Medicine, in its only award for treatments of infectious diseases since six decades prior, honoured the discovery of ivermectin (IVM), a multifaceted drug deployed against some of the world’s most devastating tropical diseases.

Playing word parsing games. So the award was shared. They still have a Nobel. Bid deal. The receipt of a Nobel prize, even if shared, rebukes the fake news claims that ivermectin was a simply a de-worming agent for animals thereby implying that it was not fit for human use. The posting of the image below is just another futile attempt to fuhrer stigmatize ivermectin. Science does not support the image below. Ivermectin, after appropriate clinical trials, may prove to be an effective therapeutic, based on science.
View attachment 94064
1631138528214.png
 
Last edited:
In 2015, the Nobel Committee for Physiology or Medicine, in its only award for treatments of infectious diseases since six decades prior, honoured the discovery of ivermectin (IVM), a multifaceted drug deployed against some of the world’s most devastating tropical diseases.

Playing word parsing games. So the award was shared. They still have a Nobel. Big deal, considering your regurgitation that ivermectin was a simply a de-worming agent for animals thereby implying that it was not fit for human use and then posting the image below.
Well at least Rolling Stone ran a retraction. It is not a treatment for malaria as your statement implies. It can be a tool to cut down on the prevalance of malaria as it apparently kills the mosquitos who feed on bloodmeal containing ivermectin before the reproduce.

I never said there wasn't a human use for ivermectin. It's just the idiots who are taking the animal versions of a drug from Walmart that has not yet been proven to be an effective treatment for covid. Will it in the future? Time will tell. It took nearly a year to prove the vaccines effective and they still don't know all there is to know about covid, the vaccines, or other treatments.
 
Well at least Rolling Stone ran a retraction. It is not a treatment for malaria as your statement implies. It can be a tool to cut down on the prevalance of malaria as it apparently kills the mosquitos who feed on bloodmeal containing ivermectin before the reproduce.

I never said there wasn't a human use for ivermectin. It's just the idiots who are taking the animal versions of a drug from Walmart that has not yet been proven to be an effective treatment for covid. Will it in the future? Time will tell. It took nearly a year to prove the vaccines effective and they still don't know all there is to know about covid, the vaccines, or other treatments.

It would have taken you very little time to recognize that the makers of Avermectin slightly improved the forumula to produce Ivermectin based on the same work to reduce the effects of parasitic infections. And the name change is required by FDA rules. Change the formula, change the name. You sometimes chide us for incomplete research. What goes around comes around.

The earlier article you referenced comes from an OBVIOUSLY biased "news" source and the research they report shows no evidence of a control study to decide whether the reported effects were statistically significant with respect to the control group. Crap reporting at its finest!
 
Incorrect, or as you like to put it, Fake News!
I'm not seeing how his post was incorrect. He stated something, you then said it was wrong, but then repeated & proved it with a quote showing it was right. Except you left out the part where they actually spelled it Ivermectin, but I'm sure that was just a minor mistake.
 
It can be a tool to cut down on the prevalance of malaria as it apparently kills the mosquitos who feed on bloodmeal containing ivermectin before the reproduce.

No. It is not just used on mosquitos. It clearly says it was used for HUMANS and to TREAT parasitic infections.
 
Rolling Stone combined several propaganda pieces together. The first was the ivermectin lie, The second was gunshot victims in Oklahoma couldn't get into the hospital. And the third was really ironic, the stooges used a photo of people in Oklahoma waiting in line to get their C19 jab, wow.

It's all propaganda and they're not really hiding it.

 
Last edited:
Australian public health chief accidentally mentions New World Order while answering C19 question, wow. You can't make this sh*t up
Twitter and youtube say NWO doesn't exist, it is a conspiracy theory. I guess she won't be invited to the next G-20 meeting :ROFLMAO:

 
Last edited:
If you look at the back drop, it says nsw.gov.au. NSW stands for New South Wales, one of the states of Australia, albeit the largest. The health officer is speaking in terms of opening borders to other Australian states.
 
"The New World Order" doesn't set off alarms bells? So it working 🤫 :cool:
 
On August 25, 2021 the following was released:
President Biden on Tuesday received a classified report from the intelligence community that was inconclusive about the origins of the novel coronavirus, including whether the pathogen jumped from an animal to a human as part of a natural process, or escaped from a lab in central China, according to two U.S. officials familiar with the matter.
The report can be considered fake news in the sense that it never really delves into the origins of Covid. It would appear the fundamental origins of Covid could be (directly or indirectly) attributed to Dr. Fauci through the approval and funding of "gain-of-function" research. The potential that "gain-of-function" may have been a cause of Covid is not even contemplated in the Post article.

Yesterday Fox News reprted"
Today the following carton was published. Once again, the media does not want the proverbial "curtain" hiding the truth to be opened.

1631277874810.png
 
Last edited:
So who determines what constitutes "misinformation"?
Consider also that the official guidance on Covid is all over the map. Fox News has been running endless clips of official pundits one day making one recommendation to only change their recommendations and never acknowledging that they are flip-flopping.
So Elizabeth Warren has come-out-of-the-closet to say that the burning of books for unauthorized themes is acceptable.
Censorship is OK and must be unthinkingly embraced.
 
Last edited:
Niki Minaj is just now finding out you can't question science. The Whitehouse has offered to re-educate her about the dangers of free speech but so far Niki isn't having it. :love::love::LOL:

1631849476716.png
 
1631894018446.png


Don't forget the border czar Kamala Harris was against it just before she was for it. Just about every liberal was against the vaccine when President Trump was in office. It's about science people, not politics :LOL: :LOL::ROFLMAO:

Climate change is no different, just another power grab.
 
Why is it the places with the highest vaccine rates also have the highest re-infection rates? Israel comes to mind, or is that just right-wing propaganda?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom