Religion (1 Viewer)

Religion?

  • I believe

    Votes: 11 52.4%
  • I dont believe

    Votes: 4 19.0%
  • I believe it's corrupt

    Votes: 6 28.6%

  • Total voters
    21
jsanders said:
He said southern churches, last time I checked Black Americans living in the south are actually Americans

Pity you didn't tell the whites that when they were leaving their church on a Sunday to go and lynch the Blacks and burn down their houses etc:rolleyes:
 
Rich said:
Pity you didn't tell the whites that when they were leaving their church on a Sunday to go and lynch the Blacks and burn down their houses etc:rolleyes:

Are you trying to make a real conversation here? Or is the gin setting in already?
 
Rich said:
Pity you didn't tell the whites that when they were leaving their church on a Sunday to go and lynch the Blacks and burn down their houses etc:rolleyes:
only when you withdrawl your troops from the siege of Jerusalem...:rolleyes:

What sort of knot in the space-time continuum are you stuck in, anyway?:eek:
 
Bodisathva said:
only when you withdrawl your troops from the siege of Jerusalem...:rolleyes:

Eh?:confused:


What sort of knot in the space-time continuum are you stuck in, anyway?:eek
Not stuck in any time warp, when's Jackson gonna be elected Preident?:eek: :rolleyes:
 
Rich said:
exactly:rolleyes:
Rich said:
Not stuck in any time warp, when's Jackson gonna be elected Preident?:eek: :rolleyes:
Michael? I think he's trying to get into Catholic Seminary...

OH...Jesse? He's still in line at Denny's
 
Last edited:
Rich said:
Eh?:confused:



Not stuck in any time warp, when's Jackson gonna be elected Preident?:eek: :rolleyes:

Jackson?

If he were a viable candidate maybe.

Now Condi Rice; she just might have a chance.
 
jsanders said:
Now Condi Rice; she just might have a chance.
just like a snowball in hell if it has a ball-cap.

Bring on Hillary:eek: There's even been some intellectualizing over whether or not it would be possible for Bill to be the VP :D
 
Bodisathva said:
just like a snowball in hell if it has a ball-cap.

Bring on Hillary:eek: There's even been some intellectualizing over whether or not it would be possible for Bill to be the VP :D

Don't misunderstand me I don't want any of the current republicans to be in office. I merely stated that she has a chance of being elected. That is if any Republicans does, which is doubtful.

The Republicans need to take a vacation so they can get ready for their next round of raping the American economy; this latest stint has run its course.
 
It time for a political thread. Religion is really not much fun to debate.
 
jsanders said:
It time for a political thread. Religion is really not much fun to debate.
And the world would be a better place if we banned religion altogether
 
Rich said:
I guess Jenny was referring to you when she mentioned somebody drinking girls liquid:rolleyes:

Aren't all British subjects required to drink tea in the morning and towards noon start on the gin?
 
Rich said:
And the world would be a better place if we banned religion altogether

Right; another fine example of British freedom.
 
jsanders said:
Right; another fine example of British freedom.
Just like this one, aint it funny how America says terrorism is a new threat to America:rolleyes:

I remember the bombing of that Sunday School at 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham in 1963. I did not see it happen, but I heard it happen, and I felt it happen, just a few blocks away at my father’s church. It is a sound that I will never forget, that will forever reverberate in my ears. That bomb took the lives of four young girls, including my friend and playmate, Denise McNair. The crime was calculated to suck the hope out of young lives, bury their aspirations. But those fears were not propelled forward, those terrorists failed.[7]

— Condoleezza Rice, Commencement 2004, Vanderbilt University, May 13, 2004
 
Rich said:
I guess Jenny was referring to you when she mentioned somebody drinking girls liquid:rolleyes:
I was being intentionally vague in an obviously misdirected attempt at instigating thought, thereby allowing you to connect the dots in my analysis of your extremely timeline/current-event-challenged interpretations of life on the other side of the pond... without coming right out and calling you a [insert expletive here] nutter

I guess I'll have to be more blatent next time, sorry:o
 
Bodisathva said:
I was being intentionally vague in an obviously misdirected attempt at instigating thought, thereby allowing you to connect the dots in my analysis of your extremely timeline/current-event-challenged interpretations of life on the other side of the pond... without coming right out and calling you a [insert expletive here] nutter

I guess I'll have to be more blatent next time, sorry:o
Which part of your history are you having a problem with, the British events you're using as a reference happened centuries ago, can the same be said for yours that I mention?:rolleyes:
 
Rich said:
Which part of your history are you having a problem with, the British events you're using as a reference happened centuries ago, can the same be said for yours that I mention?:rolleyes:
I'd consider 40 years far enough in the past that they can no longer be considered current events. Whether 1066 or 1966, it is not applicable to current, daily life.
 
Bodisathva said:
I'd consider 40 years far enough in the past that they can no longer be considered current events. Whether 1066 or 1966, it is not applicable to current, daily life.
That would only hold water if it were true that the white southern belt would be prepared to vote for a coloured president, are you suggesting that it now will?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom